mirror of
https://github.com/yokoffing/Betterfox.git
synced 2026-06-12 15:40:48 +05:30
Updated Ghostery (markdown)
+6
-3
@@ -5,9 +5,12 @@ Last updated: 8 August 2020 | [download](https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-ex
|
||||
|
||||
Ghostery helps you browse smarter by giving you control over ads and tracking technologies to speed up page loads, eliminate clutter, and protect your data.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Betterfox Loves Ghostery ❤️
|
||||
|
||||
* Blocks ads and trackers effectively.
|
||||
* Deploys AI and heuristics to catch trackers _not_ on popular blocklists. (And if a tracker isn't blocked, then the request is modified and anonymized to prevent site breakage.)
|
||||
* Plus, [data usage is reduced by more than 100x](https://cliqz.com/en/magazine/cliqz-developers-revolutionize-ad-blocker-architecture). Instead of always downloading the complete filter lists after an update, only the entries that have actually changed are updated.
|
||||
* Deploys AI and heuristics to catch trackers that are **not** on popular blocklists. (And if a tracker isn't blocked, then the request is modified and anonymized to prevent site breakage.)
|
||||
* Enables language-specific filters [automatically](https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-extension/issues/22#issuecomment-526841301) based on your browsing habits (without any data leaving your browser).
|
||||
* Plus, [your data usage is reduced by more than 100x](https://cliqz.com/en/magazine/cliqz-developers-revolutionize-ad-blocker-architecture). Instead of always downloading the complete filter lists after an update, only the entries that have actually changed are updated.
|
||||
|
||||
## Three presets for blocking
|
||||
* ads only
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +87,7 @@ Be sure to [check out](https://github.com/yokoffing/Better-Fox/wiki/Ghostery#my-
|
||||
### Limitations of conventional content blockers
|
||||
How can you be sure that all trackers are blocked by static lists? How long does it take to create a filter when a new tracker domain is created? As far as I can see, there are a lot of exception filters to unbreak sites, what happens if these request send unsafe datapoints which can track users?
|
||||
|
||||
Take some random domains and look for cases of requests containing unsafe data being sent while having uBlock Origin enabled (default settings). Check `lesnumeriques.com`, visit a few pages and look for `ultimedia.com`: it tries to set a tracking cookie. Same for `economist.com` (check `tinypass`, not blocked but sets a tracking cookie, Ghostery removes the cookie from request), same on `msn.com`, visit a few pages and check `platform.twitter`, tries to send tracking cookie (blocked by Ghostery but not uBlock Origin), etc. Of course, **you could arbitrarily harden the settings of your content blocker, block third-party cookies, etc. but this comes with breakage, and unless you block everything, you will never be sure that all trackers are blocked**.
|
||||
Take some random domains and look for cases of requests containing unsafe data being sent while having uBlock Origin enabled (default settings). Check `lesnumeriques.com`, visit a few pages and look for `ultimedia.com`: it tries to set a tracking cookie. Same for `economist.com` (check `tinypass`, not blocked but sets a tracking cookie, Ghostery removes the cookie from request), same on `msn.com`, visit a few pages and check `platform.twitter`, tries to send tracking cookie (blocked by Ghostery but not uBlock Origin), etc. Of course, **you could arbitrarily harden the settings of your content blocker**, block all third-party cookies, etc., but this comes with breakage; and **unless you block everything, you will never be sure that all trackers are blocked**.
|
||||
|
||||
My point is not that uBlock Origin is doing a bad job; in fact, I think that this is an amazing content blocker. But there are some fundamental limitations to content blocking which prevent it from being able to perfectly protect privacy, for few reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user